Remote viewing has been explored as a tool to investigate ancient ruins that are otherwise lost, inaccessible, or hidden beneath the earth for thousands of years. This practice involves individuals attempting to gather information about distant or unseen targets—including archaeological sites—through non-traditional means. Some experiments and anecdotes have described remote viewers providing new perspectives or clues about the locations of ruins or the details of ancient structures.

Interest in remote viewing increased in the late 20th century with both private research and government involvement, particularly regarding unexplored archaeological sites. There are reports of remote viewing sessions suggesting the existence of unknown cities or contributing to ongoing archaeological inquiries. Researchers have debated the accuracy and utility of these approaches, but the concept has remained a topic of curiosity and occasional collaboration between psychics and archaeologists.

Although scientific consensus remains cautious, the ongoing discussion around remote viewing and ancient ruins highlights humanity’s fascination with exploring the past using every tool available. Many are drawn to the possibility that knowledge of ancient civilizations might be expanded in unexpected ways, driving interest in these unconventional investigations.

Understanding Remote Viewing

Remote viewing is a practice in which individuals attempt to gather information about distant or unseen targets using perception that is not mediated by the standard senses. The process involves structured protocols and often combines intuition with trained techniques used by practitioners known as remote viewers.

Origins and Historical Context

Remote viewing emerged in the 1970s as part of programs funded by United States government agencies, such as the CIA and the Department of Defense. Research into extra-sensory perception (ESP) for intelligence gathering focused on the idea that certain people could mentally perceive details about distant locations or objects.

The most notable early research took place at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), led by physicists Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff. Their work aimed to establish methods for consistently replicating results in laboratory settings. Remote viewing was distinguished from traditional psychic phenomena by standardized experiments and documentation.

The concept of perceiving hidden or distant scenes with the mind has roots in older traditions. However, scientific interest in measuring and controlling ESP-related phenomena brought structure and repeatability, which attracted broader study and skepticism.

Key Techniques and Protocols

Remote viewers typically follow a sequence of steps designed to reduce bias and ensure that impressions come from intuition rather than analysis or prior knowledge. The process often begins with a "blind" setup, meaning the viewer is given only a code or simple cue about the target.

Common elements include:

Relaxation or meditation to foster a receptive state of mind
Recording all impressions, sketches, or thoughts without filtering
Use of double-blind protocols to prevent contamination by outside information

Several protocols, such as the "Coordinate Remote Viewing" (CRV) method, were created during military research. These involve strict guidelines for session structure and documentation, aiming to increase reliability. The role of intuition is considered central, as it is believed to tap into non-local awareness during sessions.

Famous Remote Viewers

Certain individuals became well known for their roles in the development and application of remote viewing.

Ingo Swann helped develop CRV and participated extensively in early SRI experiments
Joseph McMoneagle, a U.S. Army intelligence officer, claimed hundreds of successful sessions
Russell Targ is recognized not as a remote viewer, but as a key scientist and proponent of the field

These practitioners often stressed discipline, training, and the importance of carefully controlled environments. Their experiences contributed to both mainstream recognition and ongoing debates about the validity and repeatability of remote viewing.

Remote Viewing and Intelligence Agencies

Remote viewing gained attention in the 20th century when intelligence agencies in the United States began funding research to explore its potential for information gathering. Focus centered on whether remote viewing could provide actionable data for operations where conventional intelligence gathering was limited.

CIA and Remote Viewing Programs

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) played a central role in funding and overseeing remote viewing projects from the 1970s onward. This work began in collaboration with institutes such as Stanford Research Institute (SRI). Programs aimed to test whether certain individuals could describe or "view" distant locations, objects, or even documents using only their minds.

Notably, research was often conducted under code names such as Project STAR GATE, Project GRILL FLAME, and Project CENTER LANE. The CIA’s primary objective was to assess the viability of remote viewing as an intelligence-gathering tool, particularly during the Cold War era when traditional surveillance methods had notable limitations.

Declassified documents from these decades reveal mixed results. Some experiments reportedly produced specific and accurate descriptions of locations, while others were less conclusive. By 1995, the CIA concluded that remote viewing had not been reliably proven effective for operational use, and the programs were discontinued.

Military Intelligence Applications

Military intelligence branches, including the U.S. Army and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), invested significant resources in evaluating remote viewing. Much of this effort focused on identifying whether psychic phenomena could enhance reconnaissance, locate missing personnel, or monitor activities behind enemy lines.

Military-led programs often used structured protocols like “coordinate remote viewing,” where subjects attempted to describe geographical locations using only map coordinates. Analysts compared remote viewers’ descriptions against known intelligence to judge accuracy, often employing double-blind procedures to minimize bias.

A summary of goals:

Objective Example Application Reconnaissance Describing enemy facilities Personnel Location Finding missing or captured soldiers Verification of Assets Confirming missile or equipment locations

Feedback led to skepticism within military ranks, but some advocates maintained that even partial success could justify continued research.

Psychic Spying Operations

During the Cold War, reports that the Soviet Union was investigating psychic phenomena intensified American interest. Intelligence agencies pursued "psychic spying" as a potential method to breach foreign secrets, aiming to supplement or bypass traditional espionage.

In some cases, agencies tasked remote viewers with targeting ancient or culturally significant sites believed to contain hidden artifacts or secrets, such as the Ark of the Covenant. Remote viewing sessions were documented and compared with available intelligence for validation.

Although large-scale psychic spying operations rarely resulted in actionable breakthroughs, a minority of sessions produced results considered unexpected by analysts. These outcomes were studied to understand whether remote viewing could offer unique insights not accessible through conventional analysis. Despite these efforts, interest waned by the late 1990s as scientific validation remained elusive.

Exploring Ancient Ruins Through Remote Viewing

Remote viewing has been applied to the study of ancient sites, aiming to offer descriptive data about ruins and objects that are otherwise inaccessible. Some of the most notable projects target sites that retain significant archaeological or historical interest, such as those in Egypt and the subject of biblical mysteries.

Significant Ancient Ruins Investigated

Remote viewing practitioners have selected several well-known ancient sites for investigation. These include locations such as Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, Machu Picchu in Peru, and ruins hidden in the jungles of Central and South America. Some projects utilize combinations of satellite imagery and psychic impressions, while others focus on gathering details solely from claimed extrasensory perception.

A notable application is the search for ruins beyond visible detection, especially in regions where thick vegetation or urbanization hides archaeological features. For instance, LIDAR surveys have combined with remote viewing to identify previously unseen structures beneath forest canopies.

The reports produced from these efforts often contain lists, sketches, or tables to summarize the remote viewing group’s findings:

Site Year Investigated Focus Gobekli Tepe 2018 Subsurface chambers Machu Picchu 2020 Lost temple areas Central American Ruins 2019 Buried pyramids

Case Study: Ancient Egypt

Ancient Egypt has been a frequent target for remote viewing activities, primarily focusing on the Great Pyramid at Giza and the Sphinx. Some reports from remote viewing sessions describe possible chambers or tunnels beneath the Sphinx’s paws, which aligns with speculative hypotheses in mainstream archaeology.

Individuals involved in these sessions claim to detect previously undocumented routes leading to potential storerooms or hidden artifacts. Details sometimes correspond with the results from modern non-invasive surveys, like ground-penetrating radar, though such overlap remains debated.

Other sessions have described the daily activities of ancient inhabitants or possible ceremonial purposes of monuments. While these observations remain speculative, proponents argue they can help guide future scientific exploration.

The Mystery of the Ark of the Covenant

The Ark of the Covenant is one of the most enduring mysteries and a recurring target for remote viewers. Some claim to perceive the Ark hidden in caves or sealed vaults, often specifying locations in Northeast Africa or the Middle East, with particular focus on Ethiopia and Egypt.

Descriptions typically involve elaborate ritual chambers and guardians, blending religious tradition with psychic accounts. No verifiable evidence has been provided; nonetheless, such accounts continue to spark interest among researchers examining biblical artifacts.

Remote viewers sometimes present their impressions in detailed diagrams or timeline lists, attempting to reconstruct the Ark’s journey and current status. However, these results have not yielded confirmed discoveries but do highlight the persistent allure of this ancient enigma.

Unusual Frontiers in Remote Viewing

Remote viewing projects have explored targets beyond Earth, as well as the hidden aspects of ancient sites on our own planet. The following sections describe specific cases and claims, highlighting areas where public interest and official study have sometimes intersected.

Remote Viewing Mars

Reports from the late 20th century describe remote viewing sessions targeting Mars, often conducted by practitioners associated with or funded by government agencies.

In some documented cases, viewers described seeing ancient structures or anomalies on Mars, such as pyramids, underground networks, and even hypothetical ruins. These sessions were sometimes initiated at the request of researchers following up on intriguing images from NASA’s Mars missions.

Although remote viewers provided detailed sketches and descriptions, there is no scientific consensus to support their findings. NASA has never verified any claims made by remote viewing sessions about Martian ruins or life. Such experiments remain a blend of speculation and unconfirmed observation.

The Concept of the Underground in Ancient Sites

Remote viewing has also been applied to the investigation of underground chambers within ancient ruins on Earth.

Practitioners often focus on subterranean spaces beneath monumental sites, such as pyramids or temples, describing hidden passageways, sealed rooms, or unknown artifacts. These attempts sometimes align with archaeological hypotheses about unexplored areas or lost chambers theorized via non-invasive methods.

However, remote viewing data about underground sites is not widely recognized by mainstream archaeology. While some descriptions capture public interest, physical discoveries typically require confirmation by traditional excavation or modern scanning technologies. The question of genuine underground features remains open to further scientific validation.

Scientific and Analytical Perspectives

Mainstream science approaches claims about remote viewing of ancient ruins with caution, emphasizing the need for critical analysis and empirical validation. The scientific community has investigated the phenomenon but finds notable challenges related to evidence, experimental controls, and reproducibility.

Skepticism and Debates

Many scientists view remote viewing as lacking a sound theoretical foundation and label it as pseudoscience. Reviews of remote viewing literature, including those by organizations such as the CIA, point out that consistent, repeatable evidence supporting the ability is absent.

There is ongoing debate about whether positive results can be attributed to methodological flaws, such as inadequate controls or sensory leakage, rather than genuine psychic perception. Critics also note biases in reporting, as studies with negative results are often unpublished.

Despite occasional claims of success, broad consensus in the scientific community remains skeptical. Analysis of remote viewing attempts to uncover ancient sites has not produced independently verified results that satisfy scientific standards for evidence.

Research Methodologies

Remote viewing research has used controlled experiments, typically involving blind protocols. Researchers select specific ancient ruins as targets, provide minimal information to participants, and attempt to measure the accuracy of their descriptions against real data.

These experiments often include numerical ratings and statistical analysis to evaluate results. However, critics point out that experimenter bias and subjective interpretation of results can affect findings. A summary of key methodological features:

Feature Description Blinding Avoids giving information cues Target Selection Chosen to reduce chance hits Scoring Methods Uses independent judges or ratings Statistical Analysis Tests likelihood of chance results

Replication problems and inconsistent outcomes remain a significant challenge, with most published studies failing to withstand rigorous scrutiny and peer review.

The Future of Remote Viewing and Ancient Mysteries

New developments in remote viewing offer innovative tools for exploring ancient ruins. By combining advances in both human intuition and technology, researchers may reveal details of lost civilizations not accessible by traditional means.

Potential for New Discoveries

Remote viewing has sparked interest among archaeologists and independent researchers attempting to describe ancient sites that are difficult to access. Some claim this method may help pinpoint locations of lost ruins or reconstruct details about prehistoric societies with minimal physical disturbance.

For example, certain studies and group initiatives have attempted to sketch layouts or features of ancient structures, even those buried under sediment or ice. This approach is especially appealing for places that traditional excavation methods cannot safely reach or where on-site research is restricted by environmental or political barriers.

By supplementing established archaeological processes, remote viewing could provide leads for future fieldwork or guide research priorities. If integrated with conventional data, it might offer additional hypotheses for how ancient societies interacted with their environments and the universe.

Integrating Technology and Intuition

Efforts are underway to use remote viewing alongside advanced technologies such as satellite imaging and geophysical survey tools. Some research teams have explored the combination of psychic methods with NASA-developed imaging platforms to compare intuitive results with remote sensing data.

New software allows data from remote viewing sessions to be cataloged and cross-referenced with historical and scientific records. This improves the ability to test the consistency and accuracy of intuitive information about ancient sites.

Some practitioners believe the intersection of intuition, artificial intelligence, and data analytics could refine remote viewing techniques and help filter out personal bias. By using both subjective impressions and objective measurements, researchers aim to gain clearer insights into humanity's past.

The Remote Viewing of Ancient Ruins Exploring the Mysteries of Lost Civilizations